DAOs Are Not Automatically Good at Every Collective Decision
DAOs make a compelling bet on a crowd's ability to allocate resources without central authority, but Feldman warns that decentralized organizations have recurring limits. Historical examples suggest they can coordinate some bounded purposes well while struggling with conflict, direct competition, and changing objectives.
- DAO participation is a bet on collective wisdom and coordination
- Different crowds perform differently on factual and predictive questions
- Decentralized groups can coordinate bounded purposes
- Conflict, competition, and evolving purposes are harder
- Purpose and participant composition determine likely performance
“to invest in a deo is in a way to bet on the wisdom of the crowd and not just the wisdom but on the…”
“there's certain kinds of decision making that historically are really hard to make in a decentralized way”