The Low-Conflict Person Screen
Screen relationships on kindness to third parties and self-awareness, not on shared interests.
- Difficulty
- Easy
- Time to result
- ~weeks to results
- Steps
- 7
- Confidence
- 88%
Tim opens with a Naval line he thinks about often: if you want to avoid conflict, rule number one is avoid people who are constantly involved with conflict. Naval sharpens it into an observable test. In a relationship, watch how the other person treats their worst enemy, because eventually they will just redefine you as enemy and you will get to feel that behaviour. The number one criterion he looks for is that a person has to be kind — a nice person — because in a certain context you can always be reclassified from friend to enemy. The observable signals are third-party behaviour: someone being bad to a server, engaging in unethical behaviour, suing people, or fighting people all the time. His verdict is that it is only a matter of time before they fight you. He is careful not to make it purity: everyone has conflict, no one is clean, but some people make conflict part of their lifestyle, and there are plenty of low-conflict people available. Tim adds the qualifier — low conflict and low maintenance does not mean unable to be brutally candid. Naval then supplies the positive criterion: the people he wants to spend time around are highly self-aware, not running on autopilot, not angered or made unhappy easily, not taking themselves too seriously, with separation from their own thoughts and personality, no victim mentality, no virtue signalling, low egos.
Origin
Naval developed the negative screen from watching how consistently people who fight everyone eventually fight you. The positive half he says he has not managed to write a tweet about yet, because he has had a hard time figuring out how to say it — the pattern is that the people he wants around are simply the self-aware ones.
Core principles
- 01If you want to avoid conflict, rule number one is to avoid people who are constantly involved with conflict.
- 02Watch how someone treats their worst enemy, because eventually you will be reclassified from friend to enemy and you will get that behaviour.
- 03Kindness is the number one criterion — the boundaries of someone's ethics show up in how they treat a server, not in how they treat you.
- 04Everyone has conflict and no one is clean, but some people make conflict a lifestyle, and those people you simply walk away from.
- 05The best relationships do not feel like work, and the strongest friendships form from chemistry and temperament rather than shared schools, jobs or hobbies — which is why they last thirty or fifty years.
- 06Self-awareness is the common characteristic of the people worth being around: they are not running on autopilot, do not anger easily, and have separation from their own thoughts.
How to run it
- 1
Observe how they treat their worst enemy
Do not evaluate on how they treat you. Naval's rule: watch how the other person treats their worst enemy, because eventually they will redefine you as enemy and you will get to feel that behaviour.
Pro tip You are watching a preview of your own future treatment.
Watch out Being currently on the favoured side of someone's conflict tells you nothing about your safety.
- 2
Check kindness to people with no power over them
Look at how they treat a server. Naval names kindness as the number one criterion and third-party behaviour as where the boundaries of someone's ethics become visible.
Watch out Charm directed at you is not kindness; it is a targeted behaviour.
- 3
Count the ongoing conflicts
Note whether they are suing other people, fighting other people all the time, or engaging in unethical behaviour. Naval's conclusion is that it is only a matter of time before they fight you.
Pro tip One conflict is life; a standing pattern is a lifestyle.
Watch out Everyone has conflict and no one is clean — do not screen for zero, screen for pattern.
- 4
Apply the effortlessness test
Ask whether being around them takes work. Naval's standard: the best relationships do not feel like work, you make the other person happy being yourself and they make you happy by being themselves, everyone is honest and no one is putting on an act they cannot carry for the next decade.
Pro tip The compound interest of relationships means the effortless ones are the ones you can sustain for thirty or fifty years.
Watch out An act sustained during courtship will not survive a decade — so evaluate against the decade.
- 5
Screen for self-awareness
Look for the positive markers Naval lists: highly self-aware, not running on autopilot, does not get angry or unhappy easily, does not take themselves too seriously, has separation from their own thoughts and personality, no victim mentality, no virtue signalling or bragging about who they know, low ego.
Pro tip Naval says he can literally plot on a line that the more self-aware somebody is, the more attractive they are to a large number of people.
Watch out Running on autopilot is the default state; Naval compares it to an NPC, a non-player character.
- 6
Distinguish low conflict from conflict-avoidant
Confirm the person can still be brutally candid when necessary. Tim's qualifier in the conversation is that low conflict and low maintenance does not equal an inability to say hard things.
Watch out Screening only for pleasantness selects for people who will not tell you the truth.
- 7
Walk away rather than manage
For people who make conflict part of their lifestyle, Naval's instruction is simply to walk away — it is not worth it, and there are plenty of people who are low conflict and easy to get along with.
Watch out Believing you will be the exception to their pattern is how you become part of it.
In the wild
Naval's concrete tell: if you see someone being bad to a server, or engaging in unethical behaviour, or suing other people, or fighting other people all the time, it is only a matter of time before they fight you.
→ A screening signal available on a first meeting, before any of the relationship's cost has been incurred.
Naval observes that the best friendships were formed out of nothing — not because you went to school together, not because you studied the same things, not because you work together, not because you both enjoy rugby — but because your chemistry matches and your temperament is similar.
→ Relationships that last thirty or fifty years without requiring sustained work, which is where the compound interest of relationships comes from.
Common mistakes
Judging by how they treat you
Current favourable treatment is the least informative data available, because you are on the friend side of a classification that Naval says can flip in a certain context. The enemy-facing behaviour is the real forecast.
Selecting on shared circumstances
Same school, same job, same hobby produces relationships that need work to sustain. Naval's durable ones come from matching temperament and chemistry, which is why they hold for decades without maintenance.
Confusing low conflict with agreeableness
Tim explicitly flags that low conflict and low maintenance can coexist with being brutally candid. Screening for people who never disagree selects for flattery rather than for character.
Demanding zero conflict
Naval is clear that everyone has conflict and no one is clean. A purity standard makes the screen unusable; the actual signal is whether conflict has become a regular part of their lifestyle.
Is it for you?
Best for
Anyone choosing long-horizon relationships — co-founders, partners, close friends — where the compounding cost of a bad pick is highest.
Not ideal for
Short transactional dealings where you never enter the counterparty's conflict radius.
From the transcript
“sorry before we finish that topic very important on people find the people that doesn't take work to be around the best relationships don't feel…”
“one of your quotes that i think of often and i might be paraphrasing this is if you want to avoid conflict rule number one…”
“if you see someone being bad to a server or someone engaging in unethical behavior or suing other people or fighting other people all the…”
“they're highly self-aware they're very very aware of themselves they're not running on autopilot they don't get angry easily”
From the episode
#473: Naval Ravikant on Happiness, Reducing Anxiety, Crypto Stablecoins, and Crypto Strategy