Market First, Team Second
A great team in a bad market loses; index on the market
- Difficulty
- Moderate
- Time to result
- ~ongoing to results
- Steps
- 3
- Confidence
- 90%
Elad Gil's core investing stance is market first, team second — the inverse of most early-stage investors, who say they only care about how good the human is. He has repeatedly seen amazing teams crushed by terrible markets and reasonably weak teams do very well in strong ones, so he indexes heavily on the market early: customer calls, an intuition about whether something can be big, or a thesis like 'defense is important and nobody's doing it, let me find a defense company.' He holds the rule at about 90% confidence, allowing that a truly exceptional founder (leading Perplexity's first round because Arvind kept shipping what they discussed a week later) or an extremely early bet can be a people-first exception. He also avoids 'science projects' — quantum and similar — because capitalization, science risk, and market risk stack against them.
Origin
Gil formalized this in a First Round Capital interview and traces it to passing on Lyft's Series C and to watching outcomes across two decades where the market, not the team, most often determined the result.
Core principles
- 01Most early-stage investors over-weight the team; the market matters more
- 02Amazing teams get crushed by terrible markets, and mediocre teams win in great ones
- 03Great teams can still find their way by shifting, but the market sets the ceiling
- 04The rule holds ~90% of the time — a truly exceptional founder or an ultra-early bet can override it
How to run it
- 1
Study the market before the team
Deliberately spend more time on the market than most early-stage investors do, forming a view on whether the space can support a large outcome.
Pro tip Use customer calls and first-principles intuition, not just founder charisma.
Watch out Falling for the team first blinds you to a ceiling the market imposes.
- 2
Hunt for opening markets
Look for spaces that are opening up — a regulatory, technology, or incumbency shift — and then find people to work in them.
Pro tip Sometimes you find the market first (Anduril after Google shut Maven) and then find the amazing people.
Watch out Avoid 'science projects' where science and capitalization risk overwhelm market opportunity.
- 3
Allow the exception, but only the real one
Back a team-first bet only when the founder is genuinely exceptional or the opportunity is so early there's no market to read yet.
Pro tip A founder who returns a week later having built what you discussed is the kind of exception worth making.
Watch out Don't let every impressive team become a team-first exception.
In the wild
When Google shut down its Maven defense project, Gil reasoned that if incumbents wouldn't do defense it was a great space for startups, then went looking and met a co-founder already working on it.
→ He invested early in a defense market others found unpopular, which became a major company.
Common mistakes
Backing a team into a dead market
Over-weighting the founder leads to funding great people in markets that cannot support a large outcome.
Chasing science projects
Getting distracted by how cool a technology is ignores stacked science, capitalization, and market risks.
Is it for you?
Best for
Early-stage investors and founders choosing which space to enter.
Not ideal for
Pre-idea bets on a singular exceptional person where no market exists yet to evaluate.
From the transcript
“I've seen amazing teams crushed by terrible markets and I've seen reasonably crappy teams do very well and so at this point I think the…”
“As a general rule when I make investments, it's market first and the strength of the team second”
From the episode
#863: Elad Gil, Consigliere to Empire Builders — How to Spot Billion-Dollar Companies Before Everyone Else, The Misty AI Frontier, How Coke Beat Pepsi, When Consensus Pays, and Much More